🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.