🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his desire to see critics investigated, exerting pressure on the Justice Department to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone any longer, it's damaging our reputation and trustworthiness," the leader wrote last month in a social media message.

"I was impeached twice, and indicted me (five times!)" he declared, mentioning the four criminal cases he encountered after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have subsequently been charged, in cases that numerous specialists have stated seem to be driven by politics and challenging to succeed in court.

But the most recent allegations against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal specialists and former prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's charges to Comey's is like equating apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a ex federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of the Legal Situation

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges related to the supposed mishandling of sensitive materials. Since departing the White House in 2019, he has become a outspoken Trump critic, even to call him "remarkably ignorant" and unsuitable for the presidency in his memoir.

Specialists say that while there may be political motivations to go after Bolton, the methods used to secure an charge and the proof compiled against him suggest a potentially more substantial case than the DOJ presented against Comey.

"This misconduct that's being alleged is simultaneously more severe and seems to have occurred over a significant period of time," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's national security adviser, and after his 2019 White House exit, prosecutors alleged that Bolton placed the nation at danger by improperly keeping and sending classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the documents were marked highly classified.

The indictment alleges that at a certain time a hacker gained access to Bolton's system where files were stored and sent an seeming threat to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a court appearance on Friday to eighteen separate charges of improperly handling classified information.

Retribution or a Strong Case?

The timing of his charge - coming on the heels of allegations against James - has revived questions about political pressure on the justice system.

Trump previously suggested Bolton belonged in prison, and called him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his part, wrote a publication about his time in the Trump government that was sharply negative of the leader.

"There's no question that the schedule of this indictment, when paired with additional cases, has prompted questions about the strength of these allegations, and why these counts are being brought at this time," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "if the Justice Department is capable to prove the allegations alleged and show the information is properly designated, his conduct may very well have broken the law".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking official for improperly handling sensitive materials is "rare" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that involve sensitive materials present difficulties to prosecute, but they may and are filed against equally junior and high-level officials, from occasionally," she said.

Parallels to Investigations into Trump and President

Trump likewise faced allegations of improperly storing sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and obstructing their return, but that case was eventually thrown out by a federal judge and voided by his re-election as president.

A special counsel also determined that former President Joe Biden improperly stored sensitive materials from his time as second-in-command, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's situation bears similarities to Trump's classified documents matters, said Mr Lesko, who previously held a senior national security position at the Justice Department.

Strict procedures govern the management of classified documents. To secure a guilty verdict, the prosecution must demonstrate that Bolton knew the information he was transmitting was restricted, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone not entitled to obtain it.

"Because of the classified character of the information at question in this case, we don't have a lot of particulars about the reasons the prosecution believes things like the personal notes and the other information he shared by email, and why there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Conventional Prosecution

The process by which the DOJ initiated this legal action will be under scrutiny, following Trump openly posted his wish to see his critics charged and several of those charges materialized.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's case, authorities appear to have adhered to standard procedure.

"The Bolton case and eventually the indictment appeared to have observed the standard procedure including the rules and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's brief, two-page charge, Bolton's was a more "conventional" document that "clearly outlines the details involving the circumstances and circumstances here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It appears reasonably aligned with a series of cases... where government officials improperly handled and transmitted classified material."